Free-growing or epiphytic shrub, to 2.5 m; young shoots lacking setae. Leaves 6-16(-18) x 2.8-6(-8) cm, elliptic to broadly obovate, apex acute or obtuse, margin not ciliate, upper surface with midrib impressed; lower surface often brownish, the scales overlapping. Flowers (l-)2-5(-7), in a loose terminal inflorescence, scented; calyx lobes (3-)5-12(-16) mm; corolla white, often flushed pink or purplish, rarely totally pink, usually with a yellow blotch at base, at first narrowly funnel-campanulate, later funnel-campanulate, (35-)60-85(-100) mm, outer surface scaly from base to middle of lobes; stamens (15-)17-27; ovary divided into (8-)10(-12) chambers, densely scaly, tapering into the scaly style. Flowering May-June. Royal Horticultural Society (1997)
Distribution Bhutan Myanmar N China SW India N Vietnam
RHS Hardiness Rating H3
Conservation status Least concern (LC)
An evergreen shrub up to 9 ft high, of open habit; bark papery; young shoots grey, clad with red-brown scales. Leaves lanceolate to oblong-lanceolate, sharply pointed, tapered at both ends, 3 to 6 in. long, 11⁄4 to 21⁄2 in. wide, dark green above, green or glaucous beneath but nearly covered with scales; stalk 1⁄2 to 1 in. long. Flowers very fragrant, produced from June to August in clusters of two to four. Calyx up to 5⁄8 in. long, but usually smaller. Corolla white, sometimes flushed with rose on the outside, funnel-shaped, 4 in. long and wide, five-lobed, the lobes rounded, over 1 in. wide; scaly outside. Stamens twenty, 2 in. long, glabrous; anthers orange-yellow. Ovary and style completely clad with scales. Bot Mag., t. 4805. (s. and ss. Maddenii)
Native of the Himalaya from Sikkim eastward; discovered by J. D. Hooker in 1849 in Sikkim, near the village of Choongtam, and introduced by him. It occurs at 5,000 to 9,000 ft altitude, and is not hardy in our average climate, but is a delightful shrub in Cornwall and other mild places, one of its good qualities being that it flowers later in the season than most rhododendrons; another that it is easily grown. It is named after Major Madden, who belonged to the Bengal Civil Service in 1849.
From the Supplement (Vol. V)
The species mentioned under R. maddenii on page 715 are disposed of as follows in the Edinburgh revision:
[R. brachsiphon] – Included in R. maddenii subsp. maddenii.
[R. manipurense] – Included in R. maddenii subsp. crassum.
[R. polyandrum] – Included in R. maddenii subsp. maddenii.
subsp. crassum (Franch.) Cullen R. crassum Franch.; R. manipurense Balf.f. & Watt; R. odoriferum Hutch. – Differing from the typical subspecies in the broader, more elliptic leaves; usually pubescent filaments; and differently shaped seed-capsule (Rev. 1, p. 33). It has a more eastern distribution than subsp. maddenii, from Manipur to Yunnan, south to Vietnam.
subsp. maddenii R. jenkinsii Nutt.; R. brevitubum Balf.f. & Cooper; R. brachysiphon Hutch.; R. polyandrum Hutch. – This, the typical subspecies, ranges from Sikkim to south-east Tibet.
Dr Cullen discusses the variations of R. maddenii on page 35 of his revision.
R brachysiphon Hutch.
R. brevitubum Balf. f & Cooper (1917), not J. J. Smith (1914)
This species was described from a specimen collected by R. Cooper in Bhutan near Punakha, from bushes 8 ft high, growing on a steep, dry hillside. It is supposed to differ from R. maddenii
in the much smaller corolla, with a tube only half the length of what it is in R. maddenii
, and in the downy filaments of the stamens. However, the Japanese expedition to Bhutan in 1967 found plants in the Punakha region some of which agreed with R. maddenii
, others with R. brachysiphon
, while others again were intermediate between the two species. Dr Hara has accordingly placed R. brachysiphon
under R. maddenii
in synonymy.The plants cultivated as R. brachysiphon
derive mainly or wholly from Kingdon Ward’s 6276, collected ‘blind’ in the Tsangpo gorge, Tibet, at Pemakochung, in 1924. Although the flowers are much smaller than in typical R. maddenii
, they are quite pretty, borne just as late in the season, and just as fragrant. Also, the plants are perfectly hardy in a sheltered position south of London.
R manipurense Balf. f. & Watt
R. maddenii var. obtusifolium Hutch
This species was discovered by Sir George Watt in 1882 in the Naga Hills, Assam, on Mt Japvo and neighbouring mountains, at 8,000 to 10,000 ft. A plant in the Temperate House at Kew, raised from the seeds which he sent, was named R. maddenii
by Hutchinson in Bot. Mag
., t. 8212, but nine years later this rhododendron was given specific rank by Sir Isaac Bayley Balfour, who made his description from the specimens collected by Watt.R. manipurense
was reintroduced by Kingdon Ward, who visited Mt Japvo in 1927 and collected seeds of this and three other rhododendrons originally found by Sir George Watt (R. macabeanum
, R. elliottii
, and R. johnstoneanum
). According to his field note under KW 7723, it makes a stout bush on razorback ridges, but becomes a fine tree in the forest, and also occurs as a tree 20 to 30 ft high on the face of the mountain, in company with R. macabeanum
. Kingdon Ward also collected seeds in the Adung valley, N.W. upper Burma; in the Di Chu valley, on the borders between Assam, Tibet, and Burma; and in the Mishmi Hills, Assam.The key-character used in Species of Rhododendron
to distinguish R. manipurense
and R. polyandrum
from R. maddenii
is: stamen-filaments hairy in the lower part against glabrous in R. maddenii
. But these hairs are not a very positive feature, being more in the nature of scattered, thick, watery excrescences, which can be seen on specimens otherwise agreeing with typical R. maddenii
. The leaves of R. manipurense
are commonly rounded at the apex, against acute in R. maddenii
, but there are plants in the Himalaya, agreeing with R. maddenii
in most respects, in which the leaves are obtuse. However, R. manipurense
, at least in its type-locality, is a more robust plant than R. maddenii
. Also, plants from KW 7723 appear to be quite hardy.
R polyandrum Hutch
In describing this species, from a specimen collected by Cooper in Bhutan, Hutchinson remarked that it is very near to R. manipurense
, differing in its oblong or oblong-lanceolate leaves, rounded to obtuse at both ends, and in having flowers with twenty-five stamens. Cooper sent seeds to Edinburgh, but the first introduction to private gardens was by Kingdon Ward, who collected seed of what he took to be R. maddenii
, growing in the Nyamjang Chu, Mönyul, just south of the border between Tibet and India where the two countries abut on north-west Bhutan (KW 6413, collected February 1925). When plants flowered at Nymans, Sussex, eight years later they were identified as R. polyandrum
by Dr Hutchinson, and the species received an Award of Merit when shown by Lt-Col. Messel on May 9, 1933. In this form the flowers are creamy white, yellow in the throat, but three years later another form from Nymans received the same award, with rose-pink flowers. Both forms are hardy there.Kingdon Ward collected R. polyandrum
in flower in 1938, some way south of the place where he collected the seeds thirteen years before, and reintroduced it. It may also be in cultivation from Ludlow and Sherriff 3164, collected in Bhutan.As noted above, R. manipurense
, with which Dr Hutchinson compared R. polyandrum
, is very near to R. maddenii
, and this is also true of R. polyandrum
. In this connection it is interesting to note that Ludlow and Sherriff’s 3164, collected in the Maru Chu valley at 8,000 ft, has twenty-three stamens with hairy filaments, and was therefore identified as R. polyandrum
, while their 3147, from the same valley at 7,000 ft, has only twenty stamens to the flower and their filaments are glabrous, thus agreeing better with R. maddenii
, though Dr Cowan noted that the two specimens were otherwise very similar (Notes R. B. G. Edin
., Vol. 19, p. 321). Furthermore, the plants raised from Kingdon Ward 6413 vary considerably in their foliage. In one specimen preserved at Kew they are acute at the apex, as in R. maddenii
, not rounded-obtuse as in the type of R. polyandrum
. Also, some of these plants have glabrous stamens, as in R. maddenii
, not hairy as in the type of R. polyandrum
subsp. crassum (Franch.) Cullen
R. crassum Franch.
R. odoriferum Hutch.
R. manipurense Balf.f. & Watt.
Leaves 9–15(–18) × (4–)5.5–8cm, usually elliptic; stamen filaments usually pubescent; capsule oblong-cylindrical, apex abruptly rounded to truncate.
Distribution India (Manipur), Burma, China (SE Tibet, Yunnan), Vietnam.
Awards AM 1924 (T.H. Lowinsky, Sunninghill) to subsp. crassum; buds tinted pink, flowers white. AGM 1993
Taxonomic note (R. crassum Franch., and incl. R. manipurense Balf.f. & Watt & R. odoriferum Hutch.)
This is a very variable species as the synonymy quoted indicates. However, R. maddenii is consistently characterized by the large number of stamens and by the number of ovary chambers.
R. brachysiphon Balf.f. ex Hutch.
R. calophyllum Nutt.
R. polyandrum Hutch.
Leaves 6–11(–15) × 2.8–4(–5.5)cm, often obovate; filaments of stamens often glabrous; capsule ovoid-globose, apex rounded.
Distribution India (Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh), Bhutan, China (SE Tibet).
Awards AM 1933 (Lt Col L.C.R. Messel, Nymans) as R. polyandrum; flowers white, with a yellow blotch. AM 1938 (Lt Col L.C.R. Messel, Nymans) as R. polyandrum; flowers white, flushed pink. AM 1938 (Lt Col E.H.W. Bolitho, Trengwainton, Cornwall); buds greenish yellow, flushed pink, opening white, greenish within. AM 1978 (Maj. A.E. Hardy, Sandling Park, Kent) to a clone ‘Ascreavie’, from L. & S. 1141; flowers white, flushed red-purple externally. AGM 1993
Taxonomic note (incl. R. calophyllum Nuttall, R. brachysiphon Balf.f. ex Hutch. & R. polyandrum Hutch.)
R. brachysiphon is distinctive, with small flowers, 45–48mm long, but is no more than an extreme among a series of forms that do not have clear morphological boundaries.