If you find TSO useful, please donate to our May Appeal 2026! Donate

Hydrangea flowers
 

May Appeal 2026

Please help keep TSO growing!

IDS Trees and Shrubs Online depends on generous donations to continue to make reliable information on hardy woody plants freely available to everyone, everywhere.

If you haven’t already, please consider donating to our May Appeal. If everyone who uses TSO during May 2026 gives just £10, we would cover our costs for a whole year, enabling us to accelerate our work!

Donate

Quercus affinis Scheidw.

TSO logo

Sponsor

Kindly sponsored by
The Trees and Shrubs Online Oak Consortium

The International Dendrology Society, The Wynkcoombe Arboretum, and several private individuals

Credits

Allen Coombes & Roderick Cameron (2026)

Recommended citation
Coombes, A. & Cameron, R. (2026), 'Quercus affinis' from the website Trees and Shrubs Online (treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/quercus/quercus-affinis/). Accessed 2026-05-18.

Family

  • Fagaceae

Genus

  • Quercus
  • Subgen. Quercus, Sect. Lobatae

Synonyms

  • Quercus affinis f. subintegra (A.DC.) Trel.
  • Quercus commutata Liebm.
  • Quercus nitens M.Martens & Galeotti
  • Quercus treleaseana A.Camus

Other taxa in genus

Glossary

berry
Fleshy indehiscent fruit with seed(s) immersed in pulp.
USDA
United States Department of Agriculture.
asl
Above sea-level.
bloom
Bluish or greyish waxy substance on leaves or fruits.
entire
With an unbroken margin.
lustrous
Smooth and shiny.
synonym
(syn.) (botanical) An alternative or former name for a taxon usually considered to be invalid (often given in brackets). Synonyms arise when a taxon has been described more than once (the prior name usually being the one accepted as correct) or if an article of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature has been contravened requiring the publishing of a new name. Developments in taxonomic thought may be reflected in an increasing list of synonyms as generic or specific concepts change over time.
taxon
(pl. taxa) Group of organisms sharing the same taxonomic rank (family genus species infraspecific variety).

Credits

Allen Coombes & Roderick Cameron (2026)

Recommended citation
Coombes, A. & Cameron, R. (2026), 'Quercus affinis' from the website Trees and Shrubs Online (treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/quercus/quercus-affinis/). Accessed 2026-05-18.

Tree to 30 m, trunk diameter to 1(–1.5) m. Bark smooth when young, cracking into fine fissures and plates below, and becoming dark greyish-brown with age. Branchlets slender (1–2.5 mm diameter) and reddish-brown with small, pale lenticels, sometimes covered in flaky scales when very young. Buds conical, 2–4 mm long, 2 mm in diameter, glossy brown, glabrous; stipules deciduous, 5 mm long. Leaves evergreen, dark green, 3–11 × 1–3.5 cm, oblong to lanceolate, apex acute, base attenuate, rarely rounded, shiny, upper surface glabrous, lower surface may have prominent tufts of tomentum in the vein axils, 5–12 secondary veins on each side of the midrib, sometimes inconspicuous, margin entire or sharply serrate, with 1–4 teeth on each side, sometimes asymmetric; petiole 0.1–2 cm long, glabrous or with sparse pubescence, sometimes dark and flattened at the base. Infructescence <1 cm long with one to two cupules. Cupule hemispheric, 1–1.5 × 0.5–1 cm; scales acute and appressed, brown and ciliate. Acorn subglobose, with ⅓ to ½ of its length enclosed in the cupule, 0.8–1 cm long, stylopodium small or absent, ripening in the second year. (Trelease 1924; le Hardÿ de Beaulieu & Lamant 2010; Romero Rangel et al. 2015).

Distribution  Mexico Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, San Luis Potosí, Tamaulipas, Veracruz

Habitat Pine-oak forest, 1200–2600 m, in small populations on mountain slopes, dry beds of arroyos (streams), and along waterways, on volcanic or limestone soils.

USDA Hardiness Zone 8

RHS Hardiness Rating H5

Awards RHS Award of Garden Merit (2012)

Conservation status Least concern (LC)

Taxonomic note A form with mostly entire margins was accepted by Trelease as Quercus affinis f. subintegra, based on Alphonse De Candolle’s Q. nitens var. subintegra. This is no longer recognized (Plants of the World Online 2025), and leaf shape variability of the species is considered to include entire margins. Bob Berry, however, reported collecting the species in the same location as the type (Zacualtiplan, Hidalgo) from a tree that conformed to Trelease’s description. He also confirmed that the trees he grew came true to form, as did second-generation seedlings, supporting the view that the taxon should be maintained as distinct (Berry 1999).

Quercus affinis is one of the finer Mexican evergreen oaks: vigorous in growth, columnar in habit, rugged in hardiness, and lustrous in foliage, which is a dark, luscious green and often sports copper highlights when new leaves emerge.

It was introduced to cultivation by Bob Berry, who first collected it in 1982 (Berry 8204) in El Chico, Hidalgo at 2750 m asl and planted it the following year in Hackfalls Arboretum, New Zealand. He praised the ‘good central-stemmed form’ and noted that the leaves turn yellow before falling in spring (Berry 2001). Several trees grow at Hackfalls, from this and subsequent Berry collections, and they have formed tall, finely shaped specimens, the tallest reaching some 28 m × 97 cm (Hackfalls Arboretum 2020, E. Cairns, pers. comm. 2023). It was introduced to the UK by Jim Priest (no. 79), who collected it in 1984 on Cerro Potosí, Nuevo León, at 2500 m. Trees from this collection are found at Sir Harold Hillier Gardens, Hampshire, where one had reached a modest 8.8 m in 2017, and at Kew, where they have grown faster, the larger of two reaching 16 m in 2022. A tree from a subsequent introduction, collected by Sparrow and Brewster in Veracruz in 1993 (VERA 88), has done even better, forming what Grimshaw and Bayton in 2009 described as a ‘beautfiful erect pillar of 12–13 m [× 21 cm]’ and which by 2022 had soared to 21 m × 57 cm, earning the title of UK champion for girth and height (The Tree Register 2025).

The oak sends out long, slender shoots in summer, often flushed an attractive red-bronze. Grimshaw and Bayton report that on the champion tree at Kew summer shoots can extend to 1.5 m long and soon ‘become thickly clad in leaves, giving the tree a dense, almost sombre look.’ It thrives in gardens throughout England, although sometimes unripe wood can suffer frost damage; Le Hardÿ de Beaulieu and Lamant (2010), however, went as far as to suggest USDA Zone 7 hardiness. Aside from Kew and Sir Harold Hillier Gardens, larger specimens are found at White House Farm, Kent (17 m × 32 cm, 2019), Thenford House, Northamptonshire (15 × 26 cm, 2019), and Chevithorne Barton, Devon (14 × 32 cm, 2017) (The Tree Register 2025). Shaun Haddock, who grows it at Arboretum de la Bergerette in southwestern France, decribes it as one of his favourite oaks, but he warns that a moist location should be sought for it: drought spelled finis for a Q. affinis planted in a dry site, while another planted in 1993 in a valley in the arboretum had reached 15 m × 34 cm in 2016 (Haddock 2012 and pers. comm.)

Though the name Quercus affinis is well established, this was not the name given to it by its discoverer. It was first collected by Henri-Guillaume Galeotti near Real del Monte (now Mineral del Monte) in Hidalgo, around July-August 1836 (McVaugh 1978). It appears that Galeotti sent specimens back to Belgium, and Scheidweiler, perhaps prematurely, published an illustration with a brief description in an 1837 issue of a gardening journal, giving it the name Quercus affinis, due to its similarity with Q. laurina (affinis = ‘bordering on, related to’ in Latin). He also proposed a common name in French: chêne ressemblant (look-alike oak?) (Scheidweiler 1837). Following his return from Mexico in 1840, Galeotti, in collaboration with Martin Martens, described several Mexican oaks in a prestigious scientific journal (Martens & Galeotti 1843). In it, they named this species Quercus nitens, choosing an apter, more descriptive epithet that means ‘shiny’, from Latin niteo (‘shine, glitter, bloom, thrive’). Though they recognised that this was the same taxon as Scheidweiler’s Q. affinis, they appeared to express their dim view of the earlier name by adding a damning question mark after it. Further disapproval of Scheidweiler’s name is suggested by the fact that in the same publication they applied the epithet affinis to a different species (now a synonym of Q. peduncularis). Nevertheless, Scheidweiler’s name was validly published and so stands as the correct name.