There are currently no active references in this article.
This species was mentioned by Bean (1976b) under the name P. cembroides var. edulis (Engelm.) Voss. Its gross morphology is akin to that of P. cembroides, though the leaves are almost invariably in pairs, the seeds have thinner shells, the cones are on average slightly larger with fewer, larger, thicker scales, and the umbo is often depressed (rather than raised or flat). In some populations of P. edulis the immature plants are dioecious (male and female cones restricted to separate trees). Mature trees produce both male and female cones, though there are more empty seeds per cone than in the cones from immature, female plants (Floyd 1982). Thieret 1993, Farjon 2005a. Distribution USA: Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, western Oklahoma, northwest Texas, Utah, southern Wyoming. Habitat Arid, rocky slopes and mesas between 825 and 2350 m asl. USDA Hardiness Zone 4. Conservation status Lower Risk. Illustration Farjon 2005a. Cross-references B219, K214.
Away from its native range and the arid southwestern United States more generally, Pinus edulis is rare in cultivation, and for an attractive tree with very tasty nuts and huge cultural significance to Native Americans, this is surprising. Like all the pinyon group it has great potential as a relatively compact, densely furnished shrubby tree for landscaping, particularly in arid places, and it is indeed used for this purpose in its native range and adjacent areas (Lanner 1981, Nold 2008). It is now commercially available in the United Kingdom, but older specimens are rare in Europe. One at Edinburgh dating from before 1969 is the most venerable traced, but it is a poor plant (M. Gardner, pers. comm. 2007). There are larger, happier trees at Kew and the Cambridge University Botanic Garden. It is also grown at Pinetum Anthoine, Jamioulx, Belgium, along with the dwarf selection ‘Juno’ from Kenwith Nursery in Devon. The related P. monophylla is another attractive, tolerant but horticulturally under-used dryland pine that deserves more attention (Nold 2008).