Kindly sponsored by
Philip & Emma Mackenzie
Tom Christian (2026)
Recommended citation
Christian, T. (2026), 'Larix laricina' from the website Trees and Shrubs Online (treesandshrubsonline.
Tree 20–30(–35) m tall, <1 m dbh. Bark on young trees grey, soon reddish- or yellowish-brown and scaly, becoming grey, detaching in thin plates. Crown conical, broadly in the south of the range, narrowly in the north. First order branches long or short, curved near their ends, ascending in young trees, level or bowed later. Second order branches short, slender, somewhat pendulous especially in old trees. Long shoots thin, flexible, pendant to pendulous, orange-brown or pruinose purplish-brown, maturing dark grey, glabrous or weakly pubescent at first; short shoots firm, 3–10 mm long, usually glabrous. Vegetative buds ovoid, 3 × 2 mm, resinous, bud scale margins ciliate. Leaves on shoots borne in pseudowhorls of 12–25, 1–2(–3) cm long, 0.5–1 mm wide, rhomboid in cross section, apex obtuse or subacute, keeled, with none or a few faint broken stomatal lines above, in two narrow pale green bands beneath. Pollen cones 5–10 mm long, yellow. Seed cones ovoid to sub-globose, apex obtuse, 1–2 cm long, 0.5–1(–1.5) cm wide at maturity, dark red or greenish-red at first, ripening orange-brown, occasionally purplish, old cones grey; peduncles short. Seed scales 10–20 per cone, orbicular or sub-orbicular, convex, 8–10 × 7–9 mm at midcone, lower surface striated, glabrous, upper margin serrulate (often weakly), incurved. Bracts ligulate, included, sometimes just visible at the base of open cones. Seeds ovoid, 3 × 2 mm, seed wings oval, 4–7 × 3–4 mm, yellowish. (Farjon 2017; Debreczy & Rácz 2011).
Distribution Canada throughout United States Central Alaska (a disjunct population), thence the Great Lakes and New England States (Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Richmond, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin)
Habitat Lowland boreal forests (1–1200 m asl). A pioneer species occuring in a range of habitats across a broad range, but commonly associated with poorly drained sites. Also common on steep rocky slopes, muskegs, etc., usually in association with other boreal conifer species and, after disturbance, with broadleaves including Betula papyrifera, B. populifolia, Populus balsamifera, P. tremuloides, Salix spp., and various ericaceous shrubs. In the east of its range it more commonly occurs in mixed coniferous/broadleaf forest, especially with Picea spp. and Thuja occidentalis. The climate is variable, from cold moist maritime on Canada's Atlantic seaboard to strongly continental in the interior.
USDA Hardiness Zone 1-5
RHS Hardiness Rating H7
Conservation status Least concern (LC)
Tamarack, Larix laricina, is one of the most widely distributed conifers in North America. It occurs across the entire breadth of Canada, in a great, almost un-interrupted swathe from the Yukon to the Atlantic seaboard; it stays well north of the border as far as the Great Lakes region where it plunges south into the United States, finding its southern limit the northern Appalachian mountains. It also has an extensive though disjunct distribution in Alaska. The species is an important component of the boreal and sub-arctic conifer forests that stretch across most of northern Canada, associating throughout with Abies balsamea, Picea glauca, P. mariana, Pinus banksiana, and just a few broadleaves, mainly Betula and Populus (Debreczy & Rácz 2011, and see habitat notes above). Only in the east of the range, where the proximity of the North Atlantic Ocean influences the climate, does this forest become significantly more diverse, with species like Picea rubens and Thuja occidentalis beginning to commonly associate together with an enlarged cast of broadleaves; this is also the part of the range where the species is most likely to form pure stands, albeit locally (Farjon 2017).
As a wild plant Larix laricina favours poorly drained sites including swamps and peat bogs (muskegs), and particularly in the south of its range its tolerance of such conditions gives it a competetive edge over several of its associates (Farjon 2017). It shares this trait with other species distributed in boreal regions (L. sibirica, L. gmelinii, and to a very limited extent L. kaempferi) but L. laricina is perhaps the best adapted of all to wet ground.
The species was an early arrival into Europe, but there is some doubt as to exactly when it was introduced. Like so many other North American trees Larix laricina would likely have been introduced to France during the 18th century, but the revolution swept away records and probably any surviving trees too. Across the English Channel we know that the 2nd Duke of Atholl planted L. laricina at Whitton near Hounslow (modern southwest London) in 1760 (Loudon 1838), but Peter Collinson was growing a North American larch at Peckham in 1739 and in all probability this was Larix laricina (Bean 1981; Mitchell 1972).
Whatever the date of its introduction Larix laricina has never done much to fire the European imagination, and even in its native North America it plays only a minor horticultural role, useful on poorly drained sites but most often overlooked in favour of another species. It has the smallest seed cones in the genus – just 1–2 cm long – which are a rather attractive maroon colour when immature, but this is probably its chief point of interest. Even its autumn colour is somewhat muted compared to other species, at least in Europe (pers. obs.). L. laricina does not reach any great size in cultivation and it has proven rather short-lived: in 1907 Elwes and Henry could not trace any of the trees mentioned by Loudon in 1838; in 1972 Mitchell could not trace any of the trees mentioned by Elwes and Henry, etc. etc.
Indeed, the largest examples in modern UK cultivation were all planted in the relatively recent past. The tallest of all, 20.7 m at Bedgebury National Pinetum, Kent, was planted in 1994, while a 19 m tree at Wakehurst Place, West Sussex, was planted in 1998 (The Tree Register 2026). Trees planted on wet ground are likely to grow very quickly at first, but then slow right down later, while trees on well drained or rich soils are likely to grow slowly and to have poorer form (Mitchell 1972). The species shows little regard for microclimate in the UK and Ireland: it can grow equally well (or equally poorly) in the warm, dry south and east of England as it will in the cool, wet, north west Highlands of Scotland (pers. obs.). Its only requirements, as is the case for all larches, are for a sunny position whilst establishing and an acidic soil.
A few cultivars have been named, mainly in North America and mainly by devotees of dwarf conifers who have selected witches’ brooms, or stunted forms from particularly inauspicious habitats where trees are naturally dwarfed and stunted. None has been widely circulated and we discuss just a few of the most important ones here.
Golden-yellow young growth, fading to pale green by summer. Found as a seedling by Sénéclauze, France, in 1866 (Auders & Spicer 2012).
Here we list the most important dwarf Tamarack selections. They have mostly been propagated from witches’ brooms either from the wild or from cultivation. The RHS Encylopaedia of Conifers lists a few others found ‘in the wild’ that are clearly just repropagations of stunted trees growing in particularly challenging, marginal habitats and we do not include these.
A small bushy plant to about 1 m tall in ten years and remaining slightly wider than tall. The leaves are an unusual blue-grey colour. Listed by the Kenwith Nursery, UK, in 2009 (Auders & Spicer 2012).
Forming a compact mound to 30 cm tall and broad in ten years. Selected from a witches’ broom found on the property of Al Bingman in Illinois (Hatch 2024).
A dense bush growing quickly at first until about 1.5 m tall, then slowing down. It bears ‘sparkling blue needles’. Raised by S. Waxman of Connecticut, USA, and introduced in 1993. For a while it was mis-sold as an L. kaempferi selection (Hatch 2024; Auders & Spicer 2012).
A selection of sub-globose habit with pale green leaves, to 1 m tall and broad in ten years (Auders & Spicer 2012).
A particularly handsome selection forming a dense, conical-pyramidal bush 1 m tall after ten years and about the same at the base, but tapering to a narrow apex. The leaves are a good pale blue, brightest when young. Raised by S. Waxman of Connecticut, USA and introduced in 1998. Initially listed under L. kaempferi (Auders & Spicer 2012).
A slow-growing dense plant growing wider than tall, to 30 × 60 cm in ten years, with particularly short blue-green leaves. Raised by S. Waxman of Connecticut and introduced in 1998 (Auders & Spicer 2012).
Quite unlike the others listed here, this forms a prostrate mat. It occurred as a mutation in the Memorial University Botanic Garden, Newfoundland, Canada, sometime prior to 1989 (Auders & Spicer 2012).
Forming a low mound of very dense growth. Selected from a witches’ broom by Dick Jaynes of Broken Arrow Nursery, Connecticut before 1999 (Auders & Spicer 2012).
An upright conical plant with ordinary green leaves. Forming a neat pyramid 2 m tall and 1 m across at the base in ten years. Raised in the USA before 1999 (Auders & Spicer 2012).
A possibly invalid name applied to several examples in UK cultivation (The Tree Register 2026) but authorities such as Auders & Spicer (2012) and Krüssmann (1985) do not mention it. An example at Bedgebury National Pinetum (Kent, UK) has grown rather slowly for this species; planted in 1994 it was 12.5 m tall thirty years later (The Tree Register 2026). This example, at least, is rather stretching the term fastigiate – ‘loosely upright’ would be a better description! (pers. obs. 2026).
Beissner discovered a glaucous tree in the Stockholm Botanic Garden, Sweden, in 1907 and applied the epithet glauca, but this material has probably been lost to cultivation (Krüssmann 1985; Auders & Spicer 2012). Several of the dwarf selections display a good blue colour of their leaves (e.g. ‘Deborah Waxman’, q.v.).
A form with yellow female cones found in the wild in 1930 in Clearwater County, Minnesota (Auders & Spicer 2012). It was initially described as a variety, then a forma, and latterly a cultivar, but as it presumably occurs now and again in wild populations it should probably be treated as a Cultivar Group.
A vigorous selection maintaning a narrow crown, at least in youth. Raised by Josh Horky and Josef Braeu of Edelweiss Nursery, USA (Hatch 2024).
Synonyms / alternative names
Larix laricina 'Nash Pendula'
An upright plant with a leader and ‘gently weeping’ branches and branchlets up to 3 m tall in ten years; listed by Bucholz & Bucholz of Oregon in 2009 (Auders & Spicer 2012). ‘Nash Weeping’ seems to be a renaming of the original ‘Nash Pendula’ because cultivar names in Latin are not permissible under the code for the nomenclature of cultivated plants unless they can be proven to have been published before 1959.