Kindly sponsored by
Sir Henry Angest
Tom Christian (2021)
Recommended citation
Christian, T. (2021), 'Abies nordmanniana' from the website Trees and Shrubs Online (treesandshrubsonline.
Tree to 60 m tall, to 2 m dbh. Crown conical or pyramidal in young trees, becoming narrowly conical, later narrowly columnar with age, old trees often flat-topped. Bark of young trees grey, smooth for many years, becoming scaly and longitudinally fissured, brown- or blackish-grey in old trees. First order branches ascending at first, later horizontal, short; second order branches spreading horizontally. Branchlets slender, firm, shining yellowish-brown, maturing to grey, shallowly grooved, with brown pubescence in grooves. Vegetative buds ovoid-conical, to 6 × 5 mm, not resinous. Leaves of lower ranks pectinate, spreading either side of shoot and slightly forwards, leaves of upper rank somewhat radial, strongly forwards, sometimes incurved, usually obscuring the shoot, 1.5–3.5 cm × 1.5–2.5 mm, strongly twisted at base, apex emarginate or obtuse, glossy dark green above with a central groove, margins often slightly recurved, stomata in two silvery or greenish-white bands below. Pollen cones crowded, pendulous, 1–2 cm long, yellowish. Seed cones short-pedunculate, ovoid-cylindrical, with a pointed or papilliform apex, 10–16(–20) × 4–6 cm, greenish-yellow when immature, maturing reddish-yellow then brown; seed scales flabellate or cyathiform, 1.8–2.5 × 2.7–4 cm; bracts long-exserted and reflexed. (Farjon 2017; Debreczy & Rácz 2011).
Distribution Georgia Russia Caucasus Turkey Caucasus
Habitat In temperate montane forests from 900–2100 m asl, in areas characterised by warm summers and cold winters with high precipitation. It forms coniferous forest with Picea orientalis and, more rarely, Pinus sylvestris, or occurs in mixed forests with Fagus orientalis, Buxus colchica, and Ilex colchica.
USDA Hardiness Zone 5
RHS Hardiness Rating H5
Conservation status Least concern (LC)
Nordmann or Caucasian Fir, Abies nordmanniana subsp. nordmanniana, is a highly ornamental and widely grown tree. It is native to an arc of mountains around the eastern Black Sea, from extreme northeast Anatolia through Georgia into the southwest Russian Caucasus. The species is represented further west in Anatolia by its subspecies equi-trojani, discussed separately below.
Both Nordmann Fir’s scientific and common names commemorate Professor Alexander Davidovic von Nordmann, a Finn who was based at Odesa when he brought this fir to the attention of botanical science after finding it in Adjara (in modern day Georgia) in 1836 or 1837 (Jacobson 1996). The presence of a fir in the Caucasus had been known prior to 1800, but until von Nordmann’s visit it was assumed to be nothing more than an eastern extension of the widespread European A. alba (Mitchell 1996). Modern western literature generally credits its introduction to Lawson’s Nursery of Edinburgh, UK, although the date is contested, with the given year ranging from 1838 (Farjon 2017) to 1847 (Mitchell 1996). We know that von Humbolt introduced it to the Berlin Botanic Garden in 1848, but by this time it was already present in European collections. Baron Serret, for example, obtained plants from Lawson’s for the pinetum at Beernem, Belgium, in 1847 (Elwes & Henry 1906–1913). For Lawson’s to have provided living plants in 1847 the earlier date of introduction seem more plausible, and while there is no record of an introduction to cultivation in Russia predating the introduction to Lawson’s, it would not be surprising if such a record surfaced in the future.
Following Nordmann Fir’s introduction to Britain, young trees soon suffered from infestations of Adelges, mirroring earlier experiences with A. alba. The Caucasian species recovered faster than the European, though, and was otherwise found to be less exacting in its requirements, more vigorous, and more handsome a subject in gardens. Consequently, Nordmann Fir soon became a popular tree, and Alan Mitchell (1996) explains a series of fortunate events that led to it becoming so common a feature of larger gardens and landscapes, at least in the UK and Ireland. As Nordmann Fir first became available in the late 1840s, supplies of the other large-stature conifers, previously introduced by David Douglas from the Pacific Northwest in the early 1830s, were dwindling. They would remain in short supply until the major introductions of the early 1850s. Meanwhile, the advantages that Nordmann Fir has over A. alba helped it to usurp that species in popularity relatively quickly. With its reputation established, Nordmann Fir’s lucky break came in 1859 when the Oregon Association – an association of British landowners and a few nurserymen that had been formed in 1849, with the aim of recollecting and redistributing David Douglas’s discoveries – considered its task complete and was preparing to disband. The association was formally disbanded on 30th May 1859, but four days earlier it had accepted £50 worth of Nordmann Fir seed. This was a huge quantity of seed even by the standards of the day, and the association distributed it among its members and to multiple additional nurseries. The result was that within a few years Nordmann Fir was included in all the standard ‘sets’ of conifers sent out by nurseries to establish fashionable new pineta, a legacy still in evidence today (Mitchell 1996).
The Oregon Association’s swan song may have been the source of the first seed to reach North America. The species was introduced here in c. 1860 and was listed in the 1862 catalogue of Parson’s nursery of Long Island, New York, which fits chronologically with the massive quantity of seed received by the Oregon Association in Britain. Perhaps some of this was sent on across the Atlantic, or perhaps the Oregon Association’s source also sent a consignment directly west. Whatever the source, 1859–1860 was clearly a watershed moment for the Nordmann Fir on both sides of the Atlantic. It would become ‘one of the most common and successful foreign firs grown in Canada and the US’ (Jacobson 1996). The same is true in Britain: Mitchell noted that ‘there are specimens in almost every [British and Irish] pinetum, partly due to this last minute extension of its proper area by the Oregon Association’ (Mitchell 1996).
Perhaps when he wrote those lines Alan Mitchell doubted whether the Nordmann Fir would ever again be quite so popular as in its Victorian heyday. Alas, he didn’t live long enough to see fate deal the species yet another peculiar twist, for in recent years the Nordmann Fir has become an increasingly popular choice of Christmas tree in European countries on account of its habit of holding its needles for several weeks after cutting (Savill et al. 2016). An increasing proportion of these Christmas trees are sold as ‘living’ trees (i.e. pot grown, where top growth remains united with a catastrophically deformed root system) and after the festivities have concluded many hundreds of Nordmann Firs are planted in gardens each year. The arboreal ghosts of Christmases past are an increasingly common sight in domestic gardens the length and breadth of the UK and Ireland. The proud owners of these trees may experience a modicum of concern, or even a twinge of regret, when they learn that their Nordmann Firs can grow into enormous, albeit beautiful trees. The tallest on record grow in native forest in the Russian Caucasus where they exceed 60 m in height. Suburban gardeners should not panic, though: the tallest in cultivation is a mere 50 m, growing amongst other coniferous giants in the sheltered valley near the iron bridge at Cragside, Northumberland, UK. Several others in the UK are approaching this record, while a total of 25 known specimens exceed 40 m here (Tree Register 2020). The website monumentaltrees.com does not report any cultivated trees in mainland Europe exceeding 40 m, but there are numerous examples in central and western Europe comfortably exceeding 30 m. Height records from North America are scarce, but it is valued as an adaptable landscape tree here (Dirr 2011) and Jacobson (1996) gives two approaching 30 m, one in Rochester, New York, and another in Victoria, British Columbia, while another, in Wallingford, Pennsylvania, is reported by monumentaltrees.com. ‘Champion Trees of Pennsylvania’ report a tree at Gettysburg National Cemetery, 33 m × 1.1 m dbh in 2009 (pabigtrees.com). A remarkable report from the New Zealand Tree Register gives a tree 45 m × 1.8 m dbh growing on a farm near Tapawera, Tasman District (notabletrees.org.nz).
The giant wild trees of 60 m are illustrated in photographs on the website monumnetaltrees.com. These show beautiful Nordmann Fir-Oriental Beech (Fagus orientalis) forest with an understorey of Rhododendron. Over a large ecological range Nordmann Fir has a broad range of associates; at higher altitudes it often associates with Picea orientalis and more locally with Pinus sylvestris. It can form pure forests, and does so most often on limestone, where other tree species are less competitive.
Nordmann Fir is variable in needle length, density, and curvature, but it can readily be distinguished from nearly all other firs by its needle arrangement. The relatively broad, densely set needles are always swept forwards above the shoot, usually completely obscuring it when viewed from above, and more often than not curved slightly inward. In this arrangement it superficially resembles A. amabilis and A. mariesii, but each of those hold their needles in much flatter sprays and they tend not to have the same curvature.
Just as with Abies alba, the familiar and long-grown Nordmann Fir has given rise to a multitude of cultivars, including a large number of dwarf selections. Perhaps because its native range is in the Caucasus rather than in Europe these are fewer in number than is the case with European Silver Fir; listing a selection of the most important is, consequently, not such an impossible task as it is for A. alba. Elsewhere in this account of the genus the catch-all term ‘dwarf cultivars’ is taken to mean, typically, <3 m in ten years. Seveal of the cultivars treated separately under A. nordmanniana fall into this category; these have been afforded individual treatments on accout of their distinctiveness. The following are all, except perhaps in the eyes of dedicated specialists, very similar indeed. All are extreme dwarfs (i.e. < 1 × 1 m in ten years) unless otherwise stated:
(Auders & Spicer 2012; Hatch 2021–2022).
Awards
RHS AGM
A widely grown and variable entity. In its formative years, ‘Golden Spreader’ forms a low, spreading shrub of dense growth with good foliage colour throughout the seasons, up to 50 × 100 cm after ten years. Some well-established plants develop a leader and slowly form a dense, compact pyramid of yellowish foliage perhaps 2 or 3 metres tall given time. Like many yellow-leaved plants it benefits from some light shade in hotter regions (Auders & Spicer 2012). First found as a seedling in S.N. Schoots Nursery, the Netherlands, in 1961, it has almost completely replaced ‘Aurea’ which was always scarce, and which lacks the low, spreading character of this clone in youth (Auders & Spicer 2012).
It is interesting that of the various weeping firs, only those selected from European or west Asian species have attracted high praise (e.g. A. alba ‘Pendula’). Several pendulous cultivars have been selected from North American species, but these are mostly dwarfs, and those that are not have never gained the popularity of their European counterparts. Pendulous forms of Nordmann Fir have arisen several times in cultivation, but those that remain in commerce seem all to be the same, traceable to Young’s nursery in Surrey, UK, where it was selected before 1874. It is a somewhat irregular plant: it may form a leader with ease and without help, or require rather a lot of encouragement. Once established, though, A. nordmanniana ‘Pendula’ combines an almost exaggeratedly pendulous habit with good vigour (Auders & Spicer 2012). One example at the Sir Harold Hillier Gardens had reached 14 m by 2014, when aged nearly 40 (Tree Register 2021).
The ‘Pendula’ discussed by Hatch (Hatch 2021–2022) is a different clone. His accompanying illustration of a page from Revue Horticole of 1890 tells us this is the form found and propagated by the French nurseryman Courtois in 1869. This is “more cascading than overtly drooping” (Hatch 2021–2022) and it isn’t clear whether any trees representing Courtois’s plant are still extant. If so they are exceedingly rare, and were logic the only consideration in such matters, they would be renamed in favour of the more widespread clone described above. Until we know it is still in existence the problem is academic.
An unusual, fast-growing selection. It is sparsely branched, and the branches are quite short; the leaves are peculiarly incurved above the shoot, still obviously A. nordmanniana but quite different from the normal foliage form. Raised from seed by Sénécaluze in 1864 (Auders & Spicer 2012). A tree at Bedgebury National Pinetum, UK, had seed cones with the bracts not so prominently exserted as the typical species (pers. obs. 2020).
Common Names
Trojan Horse Fir
Trojan Fir
Synonyms
Abies alba subsp. equi-trojani (Asch. & Sint. ex Boiss.) Asch. & Graebn.
Abies bormnuelleriana Mattf.
Abies cephalonica var. graeca (Fraas) Liu pro parte
Abies equi-trojani (Asch. & Sint. ex Boiss.) Mattf.
Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana (Mattf.) Coode & Cullen
Abies nordmanniana var. bornmuelleriana (Mattf.) Silba
Abies nordmanniana var. equi-trojani (Asch. & Sint. ex Boiss.) Guin. & Maire
Abies pectinata Gilib. var. equi-trojani Asch. & Sint. ex Boiss.
Differing from the type in the following ways: (slightly) resinous vegetative buds; glabrous branchlets; leaves less densely set on shoots, somewhat more outspreading, often with flecks of stomata near the apex on the upper surface; bract cusps without a distinct midrib. (Farjon 2017).
Distribution
RHS Hardiness Rating: H7
USDA Hardiness Zone: 5-7
The Trojan Horse Fir – one of the more imaginatively named members of the genus – may owe its moniker to the fact that the populations from which it was originally described occur only about 60 km as the crow flies from the ancient city of Troy. An alternative theory, mooted by Tony Schilling in conversation with Lawrence Banks, goes that it is so named because when struck with a hammer it rattles… (W.L. Banks pers. comm. 2019). From typical A. nordmanniana it may be distinguished by its (usually) longer leaves, less densely set on the shoot and more radially arranged, neither so strongly forwards nor incurved above, their whitish undersides apparent at eye level without having to turn the shoots over. The prominent patch of stomata on the upper surface of the needles, near their blunt tips, help to distinguish it further, including from its other near neighbours the Greek and Bulgarian Firs (respectively A. cephalonica and A. borisii-regis).
According to Liu (1971) it was discovered ‘in the year 1883 by the Greek botanist P. Sintenis on the northern slope of the highest peak on Mount Ida’ (one of two sacred mountains to bear the name in Greek mythology, this Turkish one is now Kaz Daği while the other is on Crete, where no firs are native). It was described the next year as a variety of A. alba, later elevated to species rank in 1925, then treated as a subspecies of A. nordmanniana in volume 1 of the Flora of Turkey (Coode & Cullen 1965), which followed the prevailing view that it was a relatively narrow endemic occurring only in the Kaz Daği mountains north of the city of Edremit, in Turkey’s Aegean region. The same work treated the population some 100 km north east, on Uludağ, and those further east in the Köroğlu Dağari, as A. nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana. A tour through conifer literature reveals a great deal of confusion around and between the firs that exist on either side of the Aegean Sea and in northern Anatolia. The names bornmuelleriana and equi-trojani are inexorably linked with this confusion, and as elements of it have persisted until relatively recently, it seems sensible to attempt to disentangle the various threads.
Elwes and Henry stated that Guiniere and Maire found ‘Abies nordmanniana…growing on Mount Olympus in Bithynia’ in 1904 (Elwes & Henry 1906–1913). One hundred years hence this use of the classical name Mount Olympus is potentially confusing, for it is of course best known to us now as the seat of the Gods and the highest mountain in Greece, however, Elwes and Henry refer quite clearly to ‘Mount Olympus in Bithynia’. Bithynia was a Roman province in modern day northern Turkey, immediately east of the Sea of Marmara, and the Bithynian Olympus is known today as Uludağ, and so it is clear that the Fir Guiniere and Maire found in 1904 was that which was distinguished up until fairly recently under various permutations of the name bornmuelleriana (e.g. Debreczy & Rácz 2011). This fir was first described as distinct (as A. bornmuelleriana) in 1925, so when Elwes and Henry penned their remarkable work they would not have had any reason to distinguish the Ulludağ populations. What is particularly interesting is that at no point in their account do they suppose that the western Anatolian populations are allied to species across the Aegean, they believe they belong to A. nordmanniana, pre-empting the Flora of Turkey treatment by half a century and evidence perhaps of just how shrewd a botanist Augustine Henry was.
Soon after the publication of the first volume of the Flora of Turkey, however, Liu (1971) proposed quite a different take on matters. In early literature the fir on the Greek Mount Olympus was taken, quite reasonably, to be A. cephalonica, the Greek Fir. It is now considered to represent A. borisii-regis (see that account for further discussion of Greek populations) but for a while these populations, and those on Mount Parnassus, were treated as the Apollo Fir; A. cephalonica var. apollinis. In his 1971 Monograph Liu resurrected an older name, graeca, for the Apollo Fir in a new combination; A. cephalonica var. graeca (Fraas) Liu, and, finding the Trojan Horse Fir ‘botanically…identical’ he placed it into synonymy with his new var. graeca, and in so doing he recognised a Pan-Aegean Fir (Liu 1971). In the same work Liu concluded that the taxon circumscribed under the name bornmuelleriana was a hybrid, and he amended the name to a nothospecies, A. × bornmuelleriana, suggesting it represented a merging of A. cephalonica to the west and A. nordmanniana s.s. to the east. (Presumably Liu thought that equi-trojani, implicit in his cephalonica var. graeca, must have been involved for this is the closest fir geographically to populations of bornmuelleriana, but he doesn’t specify, nor does he address the fact that the nearest Bulgarian populations of borisii-regis, which he recognises, are no more distant from bornmuelleriana than mainland Greek populations of cephalonica).
It may be seen that Liu’s taxonomy of this group of firs is distinctly flawed; the Flora of Turkey approach has generally been favoured, but of course there are exceptions. Bean (1976) seems to err closer to Liu than to the Flora of Turkey, agreeing that equi-trojani appears closer to cephalonica, and pointing out that ‘since A. nordmanniana and A. cephalonica have both been grown in western Europe for well over a century, trees resembling A. bornmuelleriana might be hybrids of cultivated origin’ (Bean 1976) but this theory apparently ignores the presence of extensive wild populations in northern Turkey. Krüssmann (1985) treated all three Anatolian Firs at species rank, as did Rushforth (1987) who pointed out that the hybrid origin theory for bornmuelleriana ‘does not accord’ with the morphological characters of wild trees. The Flora of Turkey approach was adopted by Farjon (1990) with the amendment that he did not consider bornmuelleriana distinct from equi-trojani, whereas in their recent work Debreczy & Rácz (2011) characteristically afford species rank to both, but their descriptions of bornmuelleriana and equi-trojani contain inconsistencies regarding characters they say are useful in separating them. Farjon (2017) continues to justify merging them based on overlapping character states. Liu’s approach has persevered in some quarters until relatively recently, for example Jacobson (1996) follows his taxonomy, and his circumscriptions may occasionally be met with on labels in old collections.
New Trees followed Farjon (1990) in sinking bornmuelleriana into equi-trojani and reported on several specimens both in Europe and North America (Grimshaw & Bayton 2009), however, the statement that ‘The largest known in cultivation in the British Isles is a 22.5 m tall tree (dbh 60 cm) at Rowallane, Co. Down, measured in 2000’ is erroneous, for there are multiple records of trees comfortably exceeding 30 m in the UK and Ireland going back to 1980 (Tree Register 2020). Indeed, the tallest on record is a tree measured in 1992 at Fulmodesten Severals, Norfolk, at 37 m tall, while another at Fota, Cork, was 35 m in 1984. The tallest known to be extant in the UK and Ireland at the time of writing (spring 2020) is a 35 m tree at Bicton Park Botanical Gardens, Devon. (Tree Register 2020).
Several introductions have been made in recent years, including TURX 20 which is represented at UK collections including Kew, Wakehurst Place, and the Yorkshire Arboretum, from collections made on Uludağ in 1990. The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh’s TDI expedition of 2005 also introduced material from the same mountain (as A. nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana) under numbers 232, 233, 235, and 236. The TDI collections yielded large numbers of plants and these have been extensively distributed in the UK and Ireland under the auspices of the International Conifer Conservation Programme. Several institutions that received these TDI collections now treat them as equi-trojani, for example Bedgebury and Westonbirt. Curiously, a EUFORGEN report includes a distribution map which clearly shows the populations on Kaz Daği and Uludağ identified as equi-trojani, while the populations in the Köroğlu Dağari continue to be identified as bornmuelleriana (Alizoti et al. 2011).
It remains a point of curiosity that despite the eastern populations extending into the Köroğlu Dağari to approximately 36° east, few significant seed introductions under the name bornmuelleriana come from further east than the locus classicus of Uludağ. One exception is TURX 109, collected in native forest near the city of Bolu, in the Province of the same name. This material is also well represented in UK collections, including at the Howick Arboretum, but otherwise all known-origin material is traceable to Uludağ. Could this narrow sampling have skewed species concepts in horticulture? In the herbarium at Edinburgh Coode and Cullen verified specimens as belonging to their A. nordmanniana subsp. bornmuelleriana well distributed through the Köroğlu Dağari, in Bolu (E00236909), Kastamanu (E00236902), Sinup (E00236907), and Samsun (E00236908) Provinces, yet no documented living plants have yet been found traceable to this part of the range except TURX 109 from Bolu. It would be interesting to know whether, in deciding to synonymise bornmuelleriana with equi-trojani, Farjon considered material from the the Köroğlu Dağari or just material from the locus classicus.
Certainly, cultivated material from the Kaz Daği and Uludağ populations is more or less impossible to separate without the cheat-sheet of provenance data, which supports Farjon’s decision to sink bornmuelleriana, as do the results of Knees (2011), who found that material from the two localities cannot be distinguished genetically . However, there are forms in cultivation that appear intermediate between the Kaz Daği/Uludağ populations, and populations of subsp. nordmanniana in the far north east of Turkey, but because the name bornmuelleriana is based on the Uludağ material, this name cannot be used for the intermediate Köroğlu Dağari populations even if these are considered to warrant taxonomic distinction, an approach clearly inherent in the EUFORGEN report of Alizoti et al. (2011). Further research is needed to determine whether the Köroğlu Dağari populations do indeed merit distinction from those of Kaz Daği and Uludağ, which, in turn, do not merit distinction from one another.
If this turns out to be the case Köroğlu Dağari populations will need a new name, for the name bornmuelleriana should now be rendered a pro parte synonym of equi-trojani and its continued use would be misleading. Regarding the Köroğlu Dağari populations as an ecotype may be appropriate (a possibility long mooted for A. cilicica subsp. isaurica, for example), as the climate south of the Sea of Marmara is decidedly more Mediterranean than that of the Köroğlu Dağari (S. Knees pers. comm. 2020).
A selection which, based on descriptions in literature, represents almost exactly the same variation as ‘Robusta’, but with a different origin, having been found in one Mrs Cuttery’s garden in New York during the 1920s (Auders & Spicer 2012). Bean (1976) reported a tree over 30 m at Belladrum near Inverness, Scotland.